Perez Hilton Is A Little Man
I've tried to avoid to hoo-hah over Mario Armando Lavandeira, Jr's behavior at the Miss USA 2009 contest. Part of the reason is because I think Donald Trump, who owns the contest, put Perez Hilton (as he calls himself) up to it, on the theory that any publicity is good publicity. Another reason is that I don't think much of these kind of contests, fixating as they do the most epheremal of qualities-- physical beauty.
There is an old saying that "what Jack says about Jill tells us more about Jack than Jill." Here is the question that Jack asked Jill:
“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”
Carrie Prejean responded thusly:
“Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you.”
These aren't my opinions, and when the issue made the ballot last year, I voted in favor of wording to support gay marriages. I am also a free speech absolutist, in so far as fringe opinions, including the opinions of social and religious conservatives, need to be protected as a fundamental right. Also, these contests, as silly as they are, do test contestents on personality and poise. Political debates and job interviews always have these kind of questions, and it takes a certain mental agility to turn a difficult question to an answer in your favor without walking from core beliefs. Miss Prejean could have answer that question better.
That said, Hilton's subsequent hissy fit is no victory for gays. Just as right-wing commentators in their outrageousness play to the stereotypes that large number of people have of them, so too did Hilton's comments play to negative stereotypes about gays. He may indeed see himself as on the vanguard of homesexual civil rights, proudly marching under the flag of faggotry. But what he is really doing is inciting homophobia. Editor of The Advocate Corey Scholibo perhaps said it best: "I have to question the character of a man who attacks others on such deeply personal levels, without provocation and for self-benefit, monetary or otherwise."
There is an old saying that "what Jack says about Jill tells us more about Jack than Jill." Here is the question that Jack asked Jill:
“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”
Carrie Prejean responded thusly:
“Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you.”
These aren't my opinions, and when the issue made the ballot last year, I voted in favor of wording to support gay marriages. I am also a free speech absolutist, in so far as fringe opinions, including the opinions of social and religious conservatives, need to be protected as a fundamental right. Also, these contests, as silly as they are, do test contestents on personality and poise. Political debates and job interviews always have these kind of questions, and it takes a certain mental agility to turn a difficult question to an answer in your favor without walking from core beliefs. Miss Prejean could have answer that question better.
That said, Hilton's subsequent hissy fit is no victory for gays. Just as right-wing commentators in their outrageousness play to the stereotypes that large number of people have of them, so too did Hilton's comments play to negative stereotypes about gays. He may indeed see himself as on the vanguard of homesexual civil rights, proudly marching under the flag of faggotry. But what he is really doing is inciting homophobia. Editor of The Advocate Corey Scholibo perhaps said it best: "I have to question the character of a man who attacks others on such deeply personal levels, without provocation and for self-benefit, monetary or otherwise."
Labels: free speach, gay
