Hillary Gives a Rat's Ass
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/weekinreview/28liptak.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
"The first jury trial Mrs. Clinton handled on her own, for instance, concerned the rear end of a rat in a can of pork and beans. She represented the cannery, and she argued that there had been no real harm, as the plaintiff did not actually eat the rat. “Besides,” she wrote in her autobiography, describing her client’s position, “the rodent parts which had been sterilized might be considered edible in certain parts of the world.”
The jury seemed to buy her argument, more or less, as it awarded only token damages. But no one was particularly happy about the case or her performance. Her former partner, Webster L. Hubbell, told one of her biographers that she was “amazingly nervous” in speaking to the jury."
"It may surprise you to learn, that an attorney represents her client. etc."
(snort)
Don't be so patronizing. Yep, I know what a lawyer does. On what basis do you assume that I'm one of "you wing-nuts"? I'm pretty consistent in my blogging going way back in my roasting of the Republicans and I'll probably be voting for Billery.
This is a fairly typical post from November 2nd, 2006.
http://mymallandnews.bizland.com/index106.html
and this a few days later.
http://mymallandnews.bizland.com/index109.html
You're a shining example of those wormy hard-eyed partisan true believers of both the right and the left that is irony deficient and humorless and probably dateless as well. So to you and them I say: lighten up.
"The first jury trial Mrs. Clinton handled on her own, for instance, concerned the rear end of a rat in a can of pork and beans. She represented the cannery, and she argued that there had been no real harm, as the plaintiff did not actually eat the rat. “Besides,” she wrote in her autobiography, describing her client’s position, “the rodent parts which had been sterilized might be considered edible in certain parts of the world.”
The jury seemed to buy her argument, more or less, as it awarded only token damages. But no one was particularly happy about the case or her performance. Her former partner, Webster L. Hubbell, told one of her biographers that she was “amazingly nervous” in speaking to the jury."
"It may surprise you to learn, that an attorney represents her client. etc."
(snort)
Don't be so patronizing. Yep, I know what a lawyer does. On what basis do you assume that I'm one of "you wing-nuts"? I'm pretty consistent in my blogging going way back in my roasting of the Republicans and I'll probably be voting for Billery.
This is a fairly typical post from November 2nd, 2006.
http://mymallandnews.bizland.com/index106.html
and this a few days later.
http://mymallandnews.bizland.com/index109.html
You're a shining example of those wormy hard-eyed partisan true believers of both the right and the left that is irony deficient and humorless and probably dateless as well. So to you and them I say: lighten up.
Then what was your point in posting that drivel?
That drivel is from the The New York Times, as read with horror by the likes of you.
Labels: Clinton
posted by My Mall and News at
3:29 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home